Single junction solar cell efficiency by solar cell junction bandgap (public domain image by Sbyrnes321)
Because of the spectrum of sunlight, no single junction solar cell can achieve an efficiency of over 33.16% (the Shockley-Queisser limit).
To be absorbed by the solar cell junction, photons have to have an energy above the junction band gap energy. The band gap energy is the difference in energy between electrons in the normal, unexcited, highest energy state (HOMO – highest occupied molecular orbital) and electrons in the lowest excited energy state (LUMO – lowest unoccupied molecular orbital).
The single junction cell band gap energy, and thus the photon absorption minimum energy and maximum wavelength, can be tuned by doping or choice of materials, to respond to photons of any maximum wavelength. Every photon absorbed above this minimum energy produces one excited electron with a constant excitation energy equal to the band gap. Any excess energy, from individual photons with a higher energy than required for absorption, is wasted as heat. In external terms, the band gap sets the output voltage of the solar cell at zero current.
Thus, a low cell bandgap can tap into photons from more of the solar spectrum, but each photon absorbed produces one free electron with a constant, low excitation energy. A high cell bandgap results in a higher electron excitation energy per photon, but taps into less of the spectrum. The happy medium of optimum efficiency is a band gap of 1.34 eV which allows a maximum single junction energy efficiency of 33.16% – the Shockley-Quiesser limit.
Note that the efficiency limit only applies to simple, single-junction solar cells exposed to sunlight.
The Shockley-Queisser limit can be circumvented by the following:-
The increased efficiency of solar cells when illuminated by concentrated sunlight is both surprising and applies to both single and multiple junction solar cells. The much larger number of photons pushes up cell output voltages, provided that the cell is kept cool enough. The optimum concentration level depends on the design of specific multi-junction (or single junction) solar cells.
As an example, the NREL April 2019 six junction solar cell [abstract] operates at a (then record) efficiency of 47.1% under an optimum concentration of 143 suns. A slightly modified version of the cell at 1 sun (no concentration) has an efficiency of only 39.2%.
A multiple junction solar cell can circumvent the limit for single junctions by absorbing photons with photon absorption energies ordered from high to low in 2, 3, 4 or more junctions, such that the highest energy photons are absorbed in the first junction in the incoming light path, with the lowest energy photons absorbed in the last junction reached by the light. The bandgaps of the successive junctions are arranged so that the junctions each generate the same current when fed with the sunlight remaining after higher-energy junctions have already absorbed the lower wavelengths (with higher energy photons). The voltages produced by each junction add to give the output voltage from the multi-junction cell.
Because multi-junction solar cells are expensive to make, lenses or mirrors are typically used to focus and concentrate incoming sunlight on to a small area of multi-junction solar cells. Concentration of sunlight reduces the cost considerably as it reduces the area of costly multi-junction solar cells required to a few percent of the area from which the solar system collects sunlight. Concentration might achieve from 100 suns up to around 1,000 suns.
When optimising the financial return from utility solar PV farms, designers will normally configure a considerably higher DC solar panel capacity than the capacity of the AC grid connection. The ratio of such DC panel capacity to the AC grid connection capacity is called the ILR (inverter loading ratio). Because the sun isn’t always shining directly in daytime, the optimum financial return from a project for US fixed tilt C-Si systems in 2021 used an average ILR of 1.38. That means that, at noon on a clear day, nearly 40% of the power from the solar panels goes to waste, depending on season etc.
Solar PV plus storage enables the surplus power, otherwise discarded by the inverters or grid connection, to be recovered, stored in a battery, and discharged on to the grid during the evening peaks with high power prices. But it doesn’t necessarily provide huge quantities of additional power.
Solar panels which are fixed, with a fixed tilt angle and a constant direction, use a compromise, because they can only be completely facing the direction of sunlight twice a year! Thus they cannot capture as much energy as panels whose tilt or whose tilt and direction can be changed to keep facing the sun all the time.
The impact of 1 or 2 axis tracking on output is given in the diagram above, from an EIA document “Solar photovoltaic output depends on orientation, tilt, and tracking”, which provides a good explanation of the impact of tracking. It also covers the effect of fixed panels skewed west or east rather than directly south.
Note that concentrators, such as lenses or concave mirrors, can only concentrate sunlight arriving from a specific direction. Continuous concentration of sunlight (e.g. up to 600 suns) thus requires two axis tracking and only works using direct sunlight on clear days. Concentration is usually essential for economic multi-junction installations (except in space), and also improves the efficiency of solar cells,
In the past, even 1 axis trackers added significant expense. But 1 axis trackers are now cheaper and more reliable. As a result, according to NREL [slide 24], 89% of US utility solar PV systems installed in 2021 used 1 axis tracking.